AI consensus fit review
Money Management International for Debt Relief Companies for Consumers Behind on Payments Review
Money Management International (MMI) is a good but conditional fit for consumers behind on unsecured debt payments who can sustain a structured monthly repayment plan. Two of seven platforms named MMI during the ranking stage, with an average listed rank of 4.5 and a best rank of 3. The strongest reason.
Published by Credit Consensus Index Research TeamReviewed by Mark B. Huntley, J.D.
Published Updated

Answer Capsule
Money Management International (MMI) is a good but conditional fit for consumers behind on unsecured debt payments who can sustain a structured monthly repayment plan. Two of seven platforms named MMI during the ranking stage, with an average listed rank of 4.5 and a best rank of 3. The strongest reason to consider MMI is its nonprofit status and dual-track approach: a Debt Management Plan (DMP) for past-due accounts and a Debt Resolution Plan (DRP) for charged-off or collection accounts, both at regulated fees far below for-profit settlement costs. The main limitation is that creditor participation is voluntary, collection activity is not automatically stopped, and exact fees, eligibility, and timelines vary by state and individual circumstances—none of which are guaranteed in public materials.
Research Snapshot
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Platform mentions in ranking stage | 2 of 7 (anthropic, openai) |
| Share of included platform responses | 7 of 7 platforms provided fit assessments |
| Average listed rank | 4.5 |
| Best listed rank | 3 (anthropic) |
| Relevant product/model/plan | Debt Management Plan (DMP); Debt Resolution Plan (DRP) for charged-off accounts |
| Overall use-case fit | Good but conditional (2 good, 3 strong, 2 mixed) |
| Research date | 2026-09-07 |
Why Money Management International Qualified for This Study
Questions This Section Answers
- What makes MMI relevant to consumers who are already behind on payments?
- Which specific programs does MMI offer for delinquent versus charged-off accounts?
The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Debt Relief for Past-Due Accounts
Money Management International qualified because it is a nonprofit credit counseling agency offering Debt Management Plans specifically structured to address past-due unsecured accounts, with a separate Debt Resolution Plan for accounts already charged off or in active collections [1]. MMI holds accreditation from the National Foundation for Credit Counseling (NFCC) and the Council on Accreditation (COA), which multiple platforms cited as evidence of counselor certification standards and regulatory compliance [4]. The organization's nonprofit 501(c)(3) status distinguishes it from for-profit debt settlement firms. Platforms noted that this structure reduces concern about predatory practices and aligns the organization with consumer benefit rather than profit maximization [8]. MMI reports working with consumers "in financial distress," and its DMP is designed to consolidate multiple unsecured debts into a single monthly payment while counselors negotiate reduced interest rates and waived fees with creditors [8]. MMI's dual-track model was a key qualification factor. Google's assessment noted that MMI accommodates past-due accounts on both main tracks: unsecured accounts that are past due but not yet charged off can be enrolled in a DMP, while accounts already charged off or severely delinquent in collections can be enrolled in the Debt Resolution Plan [1]. This distinguishes MMI from credit counseling agencies that only offer repayment plans without a settlement option.
The Debt Management Plan (DMP) is the primary product relevant to consumers behind on unsecured debt payments. Under a DMP, the consumer makes one consolidated monthly payment to MMI, which distributes funds to participating creditors according to a negotiated repayment schedule [11]. The counseling agency works to secure reduced interest rates and waived late fees from creditors, with MMI reporting that average DMP interest rates drop from approximately 28% to around 6.6% [1].
A DMP is a full-balance repayment program, not a principal-reduction settlement. Consumers repay the full principal over the plan term, typically 3–5 years, with reduced interest making the payments more manageable [12]. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau describes a DMP as involving a counseling agency arranging a repayment plan and one payment, with eligibility, creditor participation, fees, and duration depending on individual circumstances [11].
For accounts already charged off or in active collections, MMI also offers a Debt Resolution Plan (DRP), which functions as a low-cost, nonprofit debt settlement program. Google's assessment described the DRP as negotiating balances for as low as 50% of the enrolled amount, with average total fees of 5.56% of the enrolled balance—compared to 15–25% typically charged by for-profit settlement firms [2]. The DRP is available in 34 states [15].
MMI also offers an Extended Modification Solution (EMS) program, which allows DMP clients experiencing temporary income drops or unexpected expenses to receive temporarily reduced monthly payments to keep the plan active without default [16].
What the AI Platforms Agreed About
Questions This Section Answers
- Where did the platforms converge on MMI's suitability for past-due accounts?
- What specific strengths did multiple platforms independently identify?
Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain
All seven platforms agreed that MMI is at least a reasonable option for consumers behind on unsecured debt payments, with ratings ranging from "mixed" to "strong." Three platforms rated MMI as a strong fit (deepseek, google, grok), two rated it as good (anthropic, openai), and two rated it as mixed (kimi, perplexity). Platforms unanimously agreed on MMI's nonprofit status and accreditation as core strengths. Anthropic, deepseek, google, and grok all cited NFCC accreditation and nonprofit structure as credibility markers [17]. Deepseek additionally noted COA accreditation [19]. There was strong agreement that MMI's DMP is appropriate for consumers who can afford regular monthly payments and want structured repayment rather than debt settlement. OpenAI described the DMP as "more relevant than debt settlement for full-balance repayment and counseling" [22]. Anthropic noted that MMI "specializes in debt management plans designed for multiple unsecured debts" [24]. Kimi observed that DMPs preserve the repayment relationship with creditors rather than taking an adversarial settlement approach [25]. Platforms converged on the fee advantage. Deepseek reported a setup fee of $0–$45 and monthly fee up to $50 [19]. Grok reported average setup fees of $33–$38 (max $75) and monthly fees of $25–$27 (max $69) [26]. Google reported DMP setup fees of $33–$75 (average $37) and monthly fees of $25–$69 (average $26), with DRP monthly fees averaging $26.59 [20]. Perplexity noted MMI publicly states average fees of $38 setup and $35 monthly [28]. All platforms characterized these fees as substantially lower than for-profit debt settlement charges of 15–25% of enrolled debt [20]. Platforms also agreed that MMI's DMP requires full principal repayment and does not reduce balances. Kimi stated this most directly: "Does not reduce principal balances—full debt plus reduced interest repaid" [25]. Grok noted the DMP "requires full principal repayment (no balance reduction)" [21]. This was consistently framed as a limitation for consumers seeking principal reduction but a feature for those wanting to repay in full.
Questions This Section Answers
- How much disagreement existed about MMI's fit for delinquent accounts?
- What specific facts could the platforms not verify?
Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities
The most significant disagreement concerned whether MMI's DMP reliably accepts accounts already in collections or charged off. Google and grok asserted that MMI explicitly supports delinquent accounts, with grok stating the DMP "explicitly supports delinquent accounts and negotiates with creditors to reduce rates" [31] and google describing the DRP as specifically designed for charged-off or collection accounts [32]. Kimi took the opposite position, stating that "DMPs typically require current or near-current accounts" and that "collection accounts and debt buyers often excluded from DMP participation" [34]. Perplexity found the evidence unclear, noting that "the reviewed sources do not clearly state whether accounts already past due or in collections are always accepted for this specific plan" [35]. Platforms disagreed on whether MMI should be considered primarily a DMP provider or a broader debt relief organization. Google emphasized the dual DMP/DRP tracks as a major strength, calling MMI "an outstanding nonprofit resource" that "bridges the gap between structured repayment and principal settlement" [38]. Kimi, by contrast, treated MMI as primarily a credit counseling agency whose DMP "may not be the optimal fit if accounts are severely delinquent or in collections" [34]. This disagreement reflects different interpretations of how well the DRP addresses the specific use case of past-due accounts. There was no consensus on whether collection calls stop after enrollment. Grok stated that "once creditors accept DMP proposal after consecutive payments, collection calls should stop if payments are made on time" [39]. Deepseek claimed MMI counselors "can negotiate with creditors to reduce interest rates and waive past-due fees, potentially stopping collection calls" [40]. However, anthropic and openai both noted that credit counseling and a DMP do not automatically stop collection calls, lawsuits, garnishment, or other collection activity [41]. The FTC guidance cited by anthropic states that credit counseling services do not provide legal protection against collection lawsuits or wage garnishment without creditor cooperation [41]. Platforms also disagreed on the typical timeline. Deepseek reported that "most clients complete their program in around 4 years" [44]. Grok reported a range of 24–60 months [45]. Google reported DMPs are structured to eliminate enrolled debt within 24–60 months [38]. Perplexity cited independent reviews describing the DMP as typically taking two to five years or around four years on average [46]. Kimi noted DMPs typically run 36–60 months [48]. These figures are broadly consistent but not identical, and no platform treated any timeline as guaranteed.
Questions This Section Answers
- How does MMI handle accounts at different stages of delinquency?
- What happens to collection activity during DMP enrollment?
- Does MMI offer hardship accommodations for consumers who fall behind?
Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs
For moderately past-due accounts with original creditors, MMI's DMP can bring accounts current over time through reduced interest rates and waived late fees. Google reported that MMI has established relationships with major U.S. financial institutions including Chase, Discover, Citi, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo to negotiate lower rates on DMPs [49]. Accounts may be considered current after DMP payments depending on the creditor and delinquency severity [51]. For severely delinquent or charged-off accounts, MMI's Debt Resolution Plan provides a settlement alternative. Google described the DRP as negotiating balances for as low as 50% of the enrolled amount, with fees averaging 5.56% of the enrolled balance [52]. The DRP is available in 34 states [54]. A Reddit discussion cited by Google reported creditor acceptance from Chase, Discover, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America on MMI's DMP [50]. Collection activity handling was a point of uncertainty. Deepseek claimed MMI provides guidance on handling collection calls and educates clients on their rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act [55]. Google cited MMI's own materials on consumer rights when dealing with debt collectors [56]. However, anthropic and openai both emphasized that DMPs do not offer legal protection against lawsuits or garnishment without creditor agreement [57]. The FTC guidance states that consumers should evaluate credit-counseling providers' services and ability to address their specific debt situation rather than assume counseling resolves collection activity [59]. MMI offers hardship accommodations through the Extended Modification Solution (EMS) program, which allows for temporarily reduced monthly payments for DMP clients experiencing income drops or unexpected expenses [60]. Deepseek noted that fee waivers are available based on financial hardship [55]. Anthropic reported that income-based fee structures and hardship waivers make the service accessible to low-income consumers [61]. Customer support features include phone, online, and in-person counseling, with clients assigned a dedicated counselor [55]. MMI has a network of offices across the U.S., though in-person branches are restricted to roughly 22–25 states while services remain accessible online and by phone nationwide [49]. Anthropic noted that support quality is reported in independent reviews as variable, with some consumers reporting responsive service and others reporting long wait times or minimal follow-up after enrollment [62].
Questions This Section Answers
- What does MMI charge for its DMP and DRP programs?
- Are there cancellation penalties or refund policies?
- How do MMI's fees compare to for-profit debt settlement?
Best Suited For
MMI's initial credit counseling session and financial review are free [63]. Ongoing program fees are regulated by state guidelines and vary by location and debt size.
| Fee Component | Reported Range | Average |
|---|---|---|
| DMP setup fee | $33–$75 (deepseek: $0–$45) | $37–$38 |
| DMP monthly fee | $25–$69 (deepseek: up to $50) | $26–$35 |
| DRP monthly fee | Not published as range | $26.59 |
| DRP total fees | Not published as range | 5.56% of enrolled balance |
| Sources: [64] | ||
| Perplexity flagged an internal inconsistency in MMI's own published figures: one MMI page states average fees of $38 setup and $35 monthly, while another states a range of $33–$75 setup and $25–$69 monthly [68]. Third-party reviews report slightly different averages, likely reflecting state caps and updated review dates [70]. OpenAI and anthropic both reported that exact current fee schedules could not be verified from public evidence and may vary by state [72]. | ||
| Cancellation terms differ between the DMP and DRP. For the DRP, MMI's FAQ states there is no fee or penalty to cancel and that undistributed funds are refunded [74]. For the DMP, cancellation terms are less clearly documented. Anthropic noted that early program termination may result in creditor contract termination and resumption of collection activity [76]. Kimi reported that remaining balances revert to original creditor terms upon cancellation and that there is no long-term contract [77]. Perplexity noted that the DRP cancellation policy "does not establish the same term for the DMP" [74]. | ||
| Creditor-imposed fees may continue or be negotiated as part of the DMP agreement, and late or missed payments may incur additional penalties depending on creditor policies [78]. Consumers must fund the agreed monthly payment, including amounts distributed to creditors and any applicable agency fee [72]. |
Money Management International is best suited for consumers with multiple delinquent unsecured accounts—credit cards, medical bills, personal loans—who have sufficient income to make a consolidated monthly DMP payment and want structured repayment rather than debt settlement [73]. The nonprofit model and regulated fees make it particularly appropriate for consumers seeking a credible alternative to for-profit debt settlement or bankruptcy [73].
Consumers with accounts already in collections or charged off may benefit from the Debt Resolution Plan, which Google described as a cheaper nonprofit alternative to for-profit debt settlement [75]. The DRP is specifically designed for delinquent or charged-off accounts and negotiates balances for as low as 50% [75].
Individuals experiencing temporary financial hardship who need flexible terms may benefit from the Extended Modification Solution program, which allows temporarily reduced monthly payments on a DMP [79]. Consumers who qualify for fee reductions or waivers based on financial hardship are also well suited, as MMI's income-based fee structure makes the service accessible to low-income consumers [78].
Probably Not Best Suited For
Money Management International is probably not best suited for consumers who cannot afford any monthly payment, since DMPs require ongoing plan contributions and fees [80]. Consumers with severely limited income who cannot sustain even reduced payments may need bankruptcy evaluation or settlement instead [80].
Consumers whose primary debts are secured loans—mortgages, auto loans—are not good candidates, as DMPs typically cover unsecured debt only [80]. Student loans, tax debts, and other excluded account types also fall outside DMP coverage [81].
Consumers seeking immediate principal reduction or rapid debt elimination may be better served elsewhere. DMPs require full principal repayment over 3–5 years, and the DRP, while offering settlement, is only available in 34 states [85]. Consumers needing very rapid resolution may find the timeline too long [80].
Consumers facing imminent lawsuits or garnishment should understand that MMI does not provide legal protection against collection activity without creditor cooperation [87]. A bankruptcy attorney or consumer rights attorney may be more appropriate when legal enforcement is already underway [80].
When Another Option May Be Better
Questions This Section Answers
- When should a consumer choose debt settlement or bankruptcy over MMI?
- Are there situations where direct creditor negotiation makes more sense?
Questions to Verify Before Buying
Debt settlement may be preferable when the consumer cannot repay the full principal and needs balance reduction on severely delinquent accounts. Kimi noted that if accounts are in third-party collections, charged off, or the consumer cannot afford restored payments, debt settlement firms or bankruptcy may be more appropriate [89]. However, platforms cautioned that for-profit settlement carries higher fees (15–25% of enrolled debt), credit damage, collection risk, and possible tax consequences on forgiven debt [90]. A bankruptcy attorney is more appropriate when lawsuits, garnishment, very high unsecured debt, or inability to fund any repayment plan is present [90]. MMI offers bankruptcy counseling as a service but does not provide legal representation [94]. Direct creditor hardship programs may be better when only one or two accounts are delinquent and the creditors offer affordable in-house arrangements [90]. Consumers with a single delinquent account may not need the structure of a full DMP. Consumers seeking immediate debt settlement at reduced principal may find for-profit debt settlement firms faster, though with higher risk and cost [93]. Consumers whose household income is too high for income-based fee waivers may find other providers with transparent flat-fee structures more suitable [93].
Before enrolling with Money Management International, verify the following with a counselor and in writing:
- Will every specific past-due, charged-off, or collection account be accepted, and which creditors or collection agencies will receive payments? [90]
- Will the agency contact creditors or collectors, and what collection activity continues during review and enrollment? [90]
- What are the exact setup fee, monthly fee, state-specific limits, waiver criteria, and refund rules for your state? [90]
- What is the proposed monthly payment, how was it calculated, and what amount reaches each creditor? [90]
- What interest-rate reductions, fee waivers, or other concessions are confirmed in writing for each account? [90]
- What is the estimated completion date under both the base payment and likely payment-change scenarios? [90]
- What happens if a payment is late, a creditor rejects the plan, income falls, or the consumer needs to cancel? [90]
- Are lawsuits, garnishments, secured debts, student loans, taxes, or medical debts included or excluded? [90]
- Will enrollment affect account closure, credit reporting, interest accrual, or access to future credit? [90]
- Is the Debt Resolution Plan available in your state if your accounts are already charged off? [96]
- Can you review the full agreement, fee schedule, creditor list, complaint process, and cancellation terms before authorizing payments? [90]
Final AI Consensus Verdict
Money Management International is a good but conditional fit for consumers behind on unsecured debt payments who can sustain a structured monthly repayment plan. The consensus across platforms is that MMI's nonprofit status, NFCC accreditation, and regulated fees make it a credible and affordable option compared to for-profit debt settlement. Its DMP is appropriate for past-due accounts with participating creditors, and its DRP extends coverage to charged-off or collection accounts in 34 states.
The main caveats are consistent across platforms: creditor participation is voluntary and not guaranteed, collection activity is not automatically stopped, exact fees vary by state and case, and the DMP requires full principal repayment over a multi-year timeline. Consumers should obtain written confirmation of account eligibility, creditor participation, exact fees, payment amounts, concessions, and cancellation consequences before enrolling.
For the specific use case of Debt Relief for Past-Due Accounts, MMI ranks as a reasonable nonprofit choice, but not a universal solution. Consumers with severely delinquent accounts in active collections, those who cannot afford monthly payments, or those facing lawsuits or garnishment should evaluate whether the DRP, for-profit settlement, or bankruptcy better addresses their situation.
For broader context on how MMI compares to other options in this category, see the debt relief directory.
How This Review Was Produced
This review was produced by aggregating fit-research responses from seven AI platforms: anthropic, deepseek, google, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity. Each platform evaluated Money Management International against the specific use case of debt relief for past-due accounts, using criteria including eligibility for delinquent accounts, creditor and collection coverage, program fees, estimated resolution timeline, monthly deposit requirements, collections guidance, and customer support.
Two of the seven platforms (anthropic and openai) named Money Management International during the ranking stage, with an average listed rank of 4.5 and a best rank of 3. All seven platforms provided detailed fit assessments, which were merged and analyzed for agreement, disagreement, and uncertainty.
Platform-reported research dates varied: anthropic reported 2026-01-15, deepseek reported 2026-04-09, and the remaining five platforms reported 2026-09-07. The authoritative research date for this study is 2026-09-07.
Methodology Limitations
This review has several limitations that should be considered when evaluating its findings:
Platform mention count. Only 2 of 7 platforms named Money Management International during the ranking stage, though all 7 provided fit assessments. The entity's final rank of 9 reflects limited ranking-stage visibility.
Source verification. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. Official-site retrieval was reported as unsuccessful for one or more mentions, and the ranking-stage identity merge should be verified directly.
Pricing conflicts. MMI's own published fee figures are internally inconsistent, with different pages reporting different averages and ranges. Exact current fee schedules could not be verified from public evidence and may vary by state.
Eligibility uncertainty. Public materials do not clearly establish universal treatment of charged-off debts, third-party collection accounts, active lawsuits, or garnishments. Platforms disagreed on whether MMI's DMP reliably accepts accounts already in collections.
Platform-reported dates. Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date. Anthropic's assessment was completed 2026-01-15 and deepseek's on 2026-04-09, while the remaining platforms reported 2026-09-07. This means some findings may reflect information available at different points in time.
No independent verification. AI-platform agreement does not prove product quality. No platform independently verified MMI's claims about creditor relationships, interest rate reductions, or program completion rates. Customer satisfaction and program completion rates are not independently verified, and anecdotal reviews show mixed results [98].
Sources
Company-Owned Sources
- Debt Management Plan page: https://moneymanagement.org/debt-management
- Money Management International: https://www.moneymanagement.org/
- About Money Management International: https://www.moneymanagement.org/about-us
- Your Rights When Dealing With a Debt Collector | MMI: https://www.moneymanagement.org/blog/your-rights-when-dealing-with-a-debt-collector
- Debt Management Plans | Nonprofit DMP | MMI: https://www.moneymanagement.org/debt-management
- Debt Management Plans from MMI: https://www.moneymanagement.org/debt-management-plan
- Debt Management Plan Savings: How Much Can You Save? | MMI: https://www.moneymanagement.org/debt-management/debt-management-plan-savings
- Extended Modification Solution Program | Debt Management Plan MMI: https://www.moneymanagement.org/debt-management/extended-modification-solution
- Debt Management Plan FAQs: https://www.moneymanagement.org/debt-management/faq
- Debt Resolution Plan FAQs | MMI: https://www.moneymanagement.org/debt-resolution/faq
- Do Debt Differently | MMI: https://www.moneymanagement.org/do-debt-differently
- Money Management International DMP Program Overview: https://www.moneymanagement.org/our-services
- Services offered by TurboDebt | TurboDebt®: https://www.turbodebt.com/what-is-turbodebt/services
Independent Sources
- Money Management International Review 2026 | BestGuide: https://bestguide.com/review/money-management-international-review/
- Choosing a Credit Counselor: https://consumer.ftc.gov/articles/choosing-credit-counselor
- Federal Trade Commission Guide to Debt Management Plans: https://consumer.ftc.gov/articles/how-choose-credit-counseling-agency
- Federal Trade Commission: Debt Collection FAQs: https://consumer.ftc.gov/articles/how-recognize-and-report-debt-collection-abuse
- What is a debt management plan?: https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/what-is-a-debt-management-plan-en-1451/
- Money Management International (MMI) Review: Nonprofit Debt Help (2026) - Finder: https://www.finder.com/debt-relief/money-management-international-review
- Money Management International Review 2026 – Forbes Advisor: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/debt-relief/money-management-international-review/
- New MMI Data Reveals Growing Auto Loan Stress - GlobeNewswire: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/03/25/2852264/0/en/New-MMI-Data-Reveals-Growing-Auto-Loan-Stress.html
- Money Management International Review: https://www.investopedia.com/money-management-international-review-8620800
- Money Management International Review 2026: https://www.lendedu.com/blog/money-management-international-review/
- Best Debt Management Plan Companies of 2026: https://www.moneylion.com/learn/debt/relief/best-debt-management-companies
- Freedom Debt Relief Review: What Debts Can Be Settled?: https://www.moneylion.com/learn/debt/relief/freedom-debt-relief
- NFCC Member Directory and Accreditation Standards: https://www.nfcc.org/
- NFCC Accreditation and Standards: https://www.nfcc.org/about-nfcc/
- Money Management International Disbursement Timelines : r/Debt: https://www.reddit.com/r/Debt/comments/1cd8n2z/money_management_international_disbursement/
- National Debt Relief Review 2026: Fees, Results & Ratings | Zogby: https://www.zogby.com/reviews/national-debt-relief/
Verify this research
Review the study details behind this page or download the public machine-readable verification record.
- Study date
- Sep 7, 2026
- Platforms analyzed
- 7
- Source records
- 29
- Ranking mentions
- 2 of 7
- Platform share
- 29%
- Final consensus rank
- #9
Research trail and source mix
Platforms
openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, google
Source mix
16 independent · 13 company-owned
Evidence support
19 direct · 10 partial
Important limitation
Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.
Source snapshot SHA-256 5170cbe156c8a41a69b2c0ed123911c901b69c1d870769f305bd064f80a542d4
Human reviewed
Mark B. Huntley, J.D.
Mark co-founded CreditKnocks.com and authored hundreds of articles covering consumer credit, credit repair, credit scores, reports, collections, loans, debt, and credit-building strategies before the publication was later sold to FinMasters.
Mark holds a Juris Doctor degree and previously practiced law. He is not currently a practicing attorney and does not provide legal advice through Credit Consensus Index.
View reviewer profileAffiliate Disclosure
Credit Consensus Index may receive compensation from certain companies discussed. Compensation does not determine AI recommendations, qualification, Consensus Scores, or ranking order.
Read the full disclosureFinancial Information Disclaimer
This research is general educational information, not individualized financial, credit, tax, investment, or legal advice. Verify current terms directly with providers.
Read the full disclaimer