{"buyer_scenarios":[{"fit":"best_suited","scenario":"Can fund a refundable security deposit of at least $200 to $300 ."},{"fit":"best_suited","scenario":"Prioritize accessibility over cost, accepting a $35 annual fee or a higher minimum deposit in exchange for a no-credit-check application ."},{"fit":"best_suited","scenario":"Want dependable three-bureau reporting to rebuild payment history ."},{"fit":"best_suited","scenario":"Can use a small limit responsibly, paying the statement balance in full and on time each month ."},{"fit":"not_best_suited","scenario":"Consumers who cannot tie up a security deposit of $200 to $300. The deposit is collateral that may remain unavailable while the account is open ."},{"fit":"not_best_suited","scenario":"Budget-conscious buyers seeking the lowest possible cost. The standard card's $35 annual fee is a disadvantage versus no-annual-fee competitors like Discover It Secured and Capital One Secured Mastercard ."},{"fit":"not_best_suited","scenario":"Consumers who expect to carry balances. High variable APRs of approximately 23.89% to 29.49% make carried balances expensive ."},{"fit":"not_best_suited","scenario":"Buyers who want automatic graduation to an unsecured card. DeepSeek and Kimi reported no automatic graduation path, and Google noted conflicting user experiences ."}],"citations":{"source_mix":{"company_owned":10,"independent":15,"unclear":1},"sources_referenced_by_questions":0,"support_mix":{"direct":19,"partial":7},"total_sources":26,"unique_domain_count":14},"claims":[{"claim_id":"claim-001","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-09","platform_support":["anthropic","deepseek","google","grok","kimi","openai","perplexity"],"predicate":"platforms_analyzed","qualifier":"valid included platform responses","subject":"Best Credit-Building Products After Repeated Credit Card Denials","unit":"platforms","value":7},{"claim_id":"claim-002","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-09","platform_support":["anthropic","deepseek","google","grok","openai","perplexity"],"predicate":"final_consensus_rank","qualifier":"Credit Building After Repeated Card Denials","subject":"OpenSky","unit":"rank","value":3},{"claim_id":"claim-003","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-09","platform_support":["anthropic","deepseek","google","grok","openai","perplexity"],"predicate":"platform_mentions","qualifier":"out of 7","subject":"OpenSky","unit":"platforms","value":6},{"claim_id":"claim-004","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-09","platform_support":["grok","google"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"strong","subject":"OpenSky","unit":"platforms","value":2},{"claim_id":"claim-005","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-09","platform_support":["openai","anthropic","deepseek","perplexity"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"good","subject":"OpenSky","unit":"platforms","value":4},{"claim_id":"claim-006","confidence":"verified","observed_at":"2026-09-09","platform_support":["kimi"],"predicate":"fit_rating_count","qualifier":"mixed","subject":"OpenSky","unit":"platforms","value":1}],"content_scope":"aggregated facts, computed metrics, and retrieval summaries","entities":[{"average_rank":3.6666666666666665,"best_rank":1,"entity_id":"entity-001","entity_type":"company","final_rank":3,"name":"OpenSky","platform_mentions":6,"platform_share":0.8571428571428571}],"identity":{"dataset_url":"https://creditconsensusindex.com/datasets/credit-building-rebuilding/credit-building-after-repeated-card-denials/opensky.json","page_url":"https://creditconsensusindex.com/credit-building-rebuilding/credit-building-after-repeated-card-denials/opensky","report_type":"fit_review","study_id":"CCI-STUDY-7A585E964759","title":"OpenSky for Credit-Building Products After Repeated Credit Card Denials Review"},"limitations":["Use the run researchdate as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.","All included platforms evaluated fit, but platformmentions counts only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery.","Do not resolve conflicting product names, pricing, or capabilities by guessing; describe the conflict and tell buyers what to verify.","The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.","Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date; disclose this as a methodology limitation.","The deterministic identity audit contains qualification notes that must be disclosed where relevant."],"methodology":{"fit_rating_contract":["strong","good","mixed","weak","uncertain"],"included_valid_platform_count":7,"maximum_finalists":10,"minimum_mentions":2,"name":"Credit Consensus Index cross-platform AI consensus analysis","platforms_included":["anthropic","deepseek","google","grok","kimi","openai","perplexity"],"platforms_queried":["openai","anthropic","deepseek","grok","perplexity","kimi","google"],"stages":["ranking_discovery","fit_assessment","normalization","editorial_synthesis"],"version":"alias-table-1"},"provenance":{"generated_at":"2026-09-09 07:56:33.795123+00","research_date":"2026-09-09","source_snapshot_sha256":"7207f48a2b416ca144ca7b47733f9366a736f0aef65c1fe9b31a83f528dd1018","verification_scope":"public_verification"},"questions":[{"claims":["claim-002","claim-003","claim-004","claim-005","claim-006"],"entities":["OpenSky"],"id":"question-001","question":"Which OpenSky product should a repeatedly denied applicant consider first?","section":"The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Credit Building After Repeated Card Denials","section_id":"the-product-model-plan-or-service-most-relevant-to-credit-building-after-repeated-card-denials"},{"claims":["claim-002","claim-003","claim-004","claim-005","claim-006"],"entities":["OpenSky"],"id":"question-002","question":"What are the key differences between the OpenSky Plus and standard secured cards?","section":"The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Credit Building After Repeated Card Denials","section_id":"the-product-model-plan-or-service-most-relevant-to-credit-building-after-repeated-card-denials"},{"claims":["claim-002","claim-003","claim-004","claim-005","claim-006"],"entities":["OpenSky"],"id":"question-003","question":"What core strengths did most platforms identify for OpenSky?","section":"What the AI Platforms Agreed About","section_id":"what-the-ai-platforms-agreed-about"},{"id":"question-004","question":"How consistent were platforms on bureau reporting and accessibility?","section":"What the AI Platforms Agreed About","section_id":"what-the-ai-platforms-agreed-about"},{"claims":["claim-002","claim-003","claim-004","claim-005","claim-006"],"entities":["OpenSky"],"id":"question-005","question":"Which OpenSky card is the better value, and why do platforms disagree?","section":"Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain","section_id":"where-the-ai-platforms-disagreed-or-were-uncertain"},{"id":"question-006","question":"Is there a reliable path to an unsecured card, and what did platforms say?","section":"Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain","section_id":"where-the-ai-platforms-disagreed-or-were-uncertain"},{"claims":["claim-002","claim-003","claim-004","claim-005","claim-006"],"entities":["OpenSky"],"id":"question-007","question":"What specific features make OpenSky workable after repeated denials?","section":"Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities","section_id":"use-case-specific-features-and-capabilities"},{"id":"question-008","question":"What are the practical limitations a denied applicant should expect?","section":"Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities","section_id":"use-case-specific-features-and-capabilities"},{"claims":["claim-002","claim-003","claim-004","claim-005","claim-006"],"entities":["OpenSky"],"id":"question-009","question":"What does OpenSky actually cost across its card variants?","section":"Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs","section_id":"pricing-fees-contracts-and-ongoing-costs"},{"id":"question-010","question":"Which card is cheapest over a typical 2-year credit-building period?","section":"Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs","section_id":"pricing-fees-contracts-and-ongoing-costs"},{"claims":["claim-002","claim-003","claim-004","claim-005","claim-006"],"entities":["OpenSky"],"id":"question-011","question":"When should a denied applicant choose a different product over OpenSky?","section":"When Another Option May Be Better","section_id":"when-another-option-may-be-better"},{"id":"question-012","question":"Which competing products did platforms name as better alternatives?","section":"When Another Option May Be Better","section_id":"when-another-option-may-be-better"}],"ranking":{"candidates_evaluated":29,"qualified_finalists":10,"ranking_unit":"Credit-building product and provider"},"schema_version":4,"summary":"OpenSky is a good fit for U.S. consumers repeatedly denied conventional unsecured credit cards, provided the buyer can fund a refundable security deposit and prioritizes accessibility over low cost. Six of seven platforms named OpenSky during the ranking stage, and five of seven rated it \"good\" or \"strong\" for this use case. The strongest reason to consider OpenSky is its no-credit-check application for secured cards that report monthly to all three major credit bureaus, making it accessible after repeated denials. The main limitation is cost: the standard OpenSky Secured Visa charges a $35…","target_buyer":"Consumers repeatedly denied for conventional unsecured credit cards who need realistic alternative products for building or rebuilding positive credit history","topic":{"base_category":"Credit building & rebuilding","category_criteria":["Accessibility after card denials","credit bureau reporting","total cost","payment affordability","debt risk","range of alternative products","long-term credit-building value"],"geography":"United States","slug":"best-credit-building-products-after-repeated-credit-card-denials","title":"Best Credit-Building Products After Repeated Credit Card Denials","use_case":"Credit Building After Repeated Card Denials"}}